Since the latter is specifically for Windows, most of the functions and features only exist within Nuendo, but not Cubase. In the hands of the same skilled engineer, a mix done in Logic with say Waves EQs and Izotope Ozone finalizer will school any mix done in Pro Tools with just the stock EQs and no finalizer.Final Comparison Summary Platform DifferenceĬubase is a Windows and Mac-based platform, while Nuendo only supports Windows.
In the end, it all comes down to the quality of the plugins you use in terms of your EQs, compressors and finalizers. The few mixes I've done on Pro Tools.same thing, Pro Tools audio sounds good, but I really don't like the app itself. Once I finally got the hang of pushing Logic, I'm now able to create mixes as good as mine were on Nuendo. Don't worry about the meter going into the red, as long as you can't hear it clipping AND you're not clipping at the final input (which you achieve with your limiters and finalizers). Two, run all your channels as "hot" as you can. I swapped it for Elemental Audio's Equim plugin. I'm not saying it's bad, just doesn't seem to get me the results I'm looking for. I've found this requires two things (note: this is strictly my experience as an ex-Nuendo user, these are not rules).one, don't use Logic's built in Channel EQ. Your Logic final mixes will only sound "full" if you make them that way. I don't know, sometimes I think Nuendo had some kind of hidden "sweetener" stage in its audio engine, but regardless, you can't bring your lazy mixing skills you picked up from Nuendo to Logic. It took me a long time to figure out why-well not exactly WHY, but how to get around it. I have to say when I first came to Logic from Nuendo, I notice that my mixes sounded very noticeably duller than they did back in Nuendo.
0 kommentar(er)
